EHR vs EMR: What’s the difference?

EHR and EMR often get used interchangeably despite being different things. EMR stands for electronic medical records: the digital version of a patient's chart within a single practice. EHR stands for electronic health records, a broader system that draws on information from multiple sources.

Historically, EMRs came first, built to serve individual practices. As care became more connected across providers and settings, EHR became both the standard term and the more clinically useful one.

What is an EMR?

Electronic medical records are the digital form of the paper charts that were used in the past. An electronic medical record contains the past medical history, medications, visit summaries, demographic and insurance information, etc.

GET EHR RESEARCH & KNOWLEDGE RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Covering the key issues faced by businesses selecting and implementing EHR.

The EMR is contained within a medical practice setting and works well for operations within the practice. However, electronic medical records cannot travel outside the practice easily. Typically, the record would need to be printed out to leave the office. When the information needs to be shared outside the practice, it is almost as if you are using paper charts.

What is an EHR?

Electronic health records do much more than EMRs. The EHR provides agile information that can be shared across practices and specialties, connecting information from all facets of patient care. EHRs are designed to be accessible by all professionals involved in a patient’s care, from physicians to nurses to laboratories and even the patients themselves.

Compare top EHR software solutions: Comprehensive side-by-side comparison matrix

The sharing of information is done securely, ensuring patient privacy and confidentiality. The secure sharing of a patient’s information allows for enhanced communication and healthcare coordination, allowing for a more comprehensive approach to healthcare.

More on the differences between EMR and EHR

The clearest way to draw the line:

• An EMR lives within one practice
• An EHR travels with the patient.

An EMR contains the clinical notes, diagnoses and treatment history recorded by a single provider. An EHR brings together records from multiple providers into one accessible view and lets those providers share information with each other.

The ability to exchange data securely is what makes EHR particularly valuable when a patient sees more than one specialist or receives care across different settings.

Do hospitals use EMR or EHR?

Hospitals typically use EHR systems because coordinating care across departments requires more than a single practice's records. EHRs connect different parts of a hospital like clinical teams, laboratories and pharmacies, so information flows where it's needed, in real time.

For example, when a physician orders a full blood count, that request goes electronically to the lab. Once the results are ready, they appear in the patient's record almost immediately. The physician can review and act on them without waiting for a printout or a phone call. That kind of workflow isn't possible with a standalone EMR.

Smaller, single-provider clinics may still use EMRs, which are a reasonable fit when patient care stays within one practice. For anything more complex, EHR is the more practical choice.

EHR vs EMR: Why EHR?

The case for EHR over EMR comes down to what happens beyond the consultation room. EHR systems store and protect health data, support electronic prescribing and communications  and give administrative teams better tools to manage operations in one connected platform.

There's also a meaningful shift for patients. EHR gives people direct access to their own records: they can review their history, message their care team and track how their health changes over time. This doesn't replace clinical guidance, but it does give patients more context about their own care, which tends to lead to better engagement with it.